nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGPs in use
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: 13 Oct 1998 15:12:39 -0700
amb () gxn net (Alex Bligh) writes:
1) If you put your backbone connected interfaces (loopbacks serials, etc.. in your IGP [isis, ospf, whatever]) 2) Have a full iBGP mesh doing next-hop-self of the loopback interface 3) Redistribute statics and connected into your iBGP routing table (with route-map, or appropriate filters as necessary that vary by vendor)No argument with the principles here but why do you need to redistribute connected interfaces into your IGP *and* into iBGP? Overkill, surely?
In fact, you not only don't need to do so, you want to avoid doing so. This simply pollutes BGP and you'll need to remove it later at the domain border where you're aggregating anyhow. Tony
Current thread:
- IGPs in use Andre' Zehl (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Timothy R. McKee (Oct 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGPs in use Megatron (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use David O'Leary (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Phillip Vandry (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Jared Mauch (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Alex Bligh (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Ben Black (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Paul G. Donner (Oct 13)
- BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Chrisy Luke (Oct 13)
- RE: IGPs in use Thom Youngblood (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use bmanning (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Richard Irving (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Paul Ferguson (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 13)