nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ?
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:27:26 -0500
use LOC (rfc1876) instead. it's more or less the same, but with more info.Thanks for the pointer, then my next question will be ... Are any registering LOC for their routers/hosts ? Any visual traceroute or similar applications using this ?
i've got one. yahoo.com has one. try this: http://www.ckdhr.com/dns-loc/ -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? bmanning (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? David Hares (Nov 18)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)