nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ?
From: David Hares <dhares () networktwo net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:20:11 -0500
Check out NeoTrace at http://www.neoworx.com/goonline/nttwor.asp It uses a flat file or DNS LOC records. Dave At 09:24 AM 11/15/99 , Jesper Skriver wrote:
Hi, As subject says, is anyone actually using these ? We were thinking of adding this to our automated dns scripts ... but if nobody actually uses them, we don't want to spend time on it ... /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
----- David L. Hares, Director of Network Engineering NetworkTwo Communications Group Phone: (734) 827-3620 650 KMS Place FAX : (734) 827-3690 Ann Arbor, MI 48108 (USA) Email: dhares () networktwo net
Current thread:
- RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? bmanning (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? David Hares (Nov 18)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)