Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)

[Phillip Vandry <vandry () Mlink NET>]

> Yes, but...
>
> The first step doing any increase difficult was done when the
> HOST_NAME->IP_ADDRESS translation was chosen instead of
>
>  HOST_NAME:SERVICE -> IP_ADDRESS:PORT
>
> Now we have a lot of troubles due to this choose.

Of course if we could implement RFC2052 everywhere...

I wonder if _any_ popular end user software has quietly added forward
compatibility with SRV records?

-Phil