Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)

["Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () virgin relcom eu net>]

After re-reading MPLS, I could not said it's the broken technology' the
MPLS over ATM with embedded QoS looks as something crazy anbd broken, not
MPLS idea itself... But mix of MPLS, NAT and IPv6... br... a crowd of
the
hangry cats together...


On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Vadim Antonov wrote:

> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:13:07 -0700
> From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
> To: alex () virgin relcom eu net, jeanlou.dupont () na marconicomms com
> Cc: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
>
> O, wow.  Take two broken-as-designed technologies, mix together...
>
> :)
>
> --vadim
>
> > I guess going to IPv6 would be simpler in this case.
> > Or, we can maybe dream of some 'service locator' function tied to inter-domain
> > MPLS tunnels...
>
> > again, just food-for-thoughts.
> > jld.

Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)