nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 08:59:59 -0400
All prefixes originating from AS2008 dissapeared from our feeds at approx. 9:30pm EDT. About an hour later, I noticed that the prefixes were back, but no longer carrying the malformed path. -Chris On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:52:18AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
So who do you blame...the RFC or the vendor that ignores it? Dropping the session seems to break the "be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you accept" suggestion. If you know someone else will ignore the rules (there's always someone) breaking due to their error kind of sucks.is there a proof of termination of this path?
-- --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil () semihuman com PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
Current thread:
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) jlewis (Oct 07)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) abha (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Rafi Sadowsky (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Matt Levine (Oct 09)
- RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Robert Boyle (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Randy Bush (Oct 08)