nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 11:46:31 -0700
I agree, it is only one step on a long road. But you have to take the first step, if nothing else, so when a "new" vendor releases a product it won't include the old behavior. Or at least, an officially revised RFC gives customers another stick to beat their vendor.
but we have the stick now. unfortunately, we also have a vendor who ignores sticks. so adding different or more sticks may not be the way to go. randy
Current thread:
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) jlewis (Oct 07)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) abha (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Rafi Sadowsky (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Matt Levine (Oct 09)
- RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Robert Boyle (Oct 09)
- RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) (DUH!) Robert Boyle (Oct 09)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd) Joel Baker (Oct 09)