nanog mailing list archives

Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?


From: Simon Higgs <simon () higgs com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:44:28 -0700


At 01:20 AM 5/2/2002 -0700, Scott Francis wrote:

The average customer buying a "web-enabled" phone doesn't need a
publicly-routeable IP. I challenge anybody to demonstrate why a cell phone
needs a public IP. It's a PHONE, not a server.

I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My current phone does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages of analog-type services?



Best Regards,

Simon

--
###


Current thread: