nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Simon Higgs wrote:
At 01:20 AM 5/2/2002 -0700, Scott Francis wrote:The average customer buying a "web-enabled" phone doesn't need a publicly-routeable IP. I challenge anybody to demonstrate why a cell phone needs a public IP. It's a PHONE, not a server.I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My current phone does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages of analog-type services?
The average customer doesn't even know what telnet is, let alone ssh. All they care about is browsing pr0n. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?, (continued)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Simon Higgs (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Dan Hollis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Avleen Vig (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)