nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest

From: Brent Van Dussen <vandusb () attens com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:27:46 -0700

The latest (april 2002) Skitter data shows sprint being slightly closer tothe internet core than qwest.


Check it out:

http://www.caida.org/analysis/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascoreApr2002.gif

-Brent

At 04:23 PM 10/16/2002, Christopher K. Neitzert wrote:

List,

Neither Sprint nor Qwest are serious about earning my business and are not
providing me with their network peering details.  I was hoping that the
list might have the collective resources to help me determine who has
better peering.

thanks

chirstopher


--
Christopher K. Neitzert / 0xC10D222F / chris () neitzert com

Current thread:

Sprint VS. Qwest Christopher K. Neitzert (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
  - Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Woodfield (Oct 23)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Kent (Oct 16)
  - Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Adams (Oct 16)
  - RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Eric M. Carroll (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest jnull (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 17)
  - Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
    - Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 18)
    - RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Borchers (Oct 18)
    - Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Leo Bicknell (Oct 18)

(Thread continues...)