nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint VS. Qwest
From: Mark Kent <mark () noc mainstreet net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Neither Sprint nor Qwest are serious about earning my business and are not providing me with their network peering details. I was hoping that the list might have the collective resources to help me determine who has better peering.
Aren't we six years past the point where people ask because they have a well founded concern? Here's a good set: {1, 701, 1239, 3561, 7018} Buy from any, buy from all. All will piss you off at one time or another, all will pass your bits as well as the next guy (at one time or another). -mark
Current thread:
- Sprint VS. Qwest Christopher K. Neitzert (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Woodfield (Oct 23)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Kent (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Adams (Oct 16)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Eric M. Carroll (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest jnull (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 18)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Borchers (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Leo Bicknell (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Niclas Comstedt (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 19)