nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint VS. Qwest
From: Niclas Comstedt <nco () comstedt net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:58:32 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
At the end of the day, no provider is even 50% of the internet (my assertion), which means more of your bits will leave your providers network then will stay on it.
I would agree with that "no provider is 50% of the internet" if you by that mean no provider has 50% of all internet traffic. I do however think it's possible that in some provider networks, 50% (or close to it anyway) of the traffic coming into the network from customers, exit on a customer port. This of course doesn't necessarily mean that 50% of the traffic sent to your customer comes from other customers (that I find very unlikely). /nco
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest, (continued)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Woodfield (Oct 23)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Kent (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Adams (Oct 16)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Eric M. Carroll (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest jnull (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 18)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Borchers (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Leo Bicknell (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Niclas Comstedt (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 19)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 22)