nanog mailing list archives

Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all]


From: lhoward () UU NET
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:04:10 -0500 (EST)


Very subtle, David.  As it happens, somebody asked only last week if
they could take up the project again.  For those who think mapping
filters to route objects is nigh trivial, there is a significant
difference between network assignees and routes.  Tracking assignments,
ASNs, customer routing policy, and which edge router each connects to
requires two scoops of Perl.

I should also point out that three out of four RIRs run a route registry.  
http://www.arin.net/tools/rr.html

Lee

On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, David Barak wrote:

Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:54:26 -0800 (PST)
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>, nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] 



--- Joe Abley <jabley () isc org> wrote:
Generating route filters from the IRR via a small
lump of script has 
the potential to be cheaper, quicker, more efficient
and less 
customer-enraging than the common alternative
approach of opening six 
different tickets with the NOC and sacrificing small
animals for three 
weeks until the updates are made.

When I was at $LARGE_PROVIDER, I was working on a
project to port all of the customer IP information
over to route-objects for precicely this purpose: the
goal was that customers would be able to update their
filters automatically (and get rWHOIS for free -
simplifying additional ARIN allocation requests).  

Sadly for that project, after I left, the little Ultra
5 was abandoned, and AFAIK is still sitting in my old
lab, unused - and after the most recent (quarterly)
staff-bloodletting, there certainly won't be resources
to devote to a project like that.  Sigh.



=====
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/



Current thread: