nanog mailing list archives
RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all]
From: Jim Deleskie <jdeleski () rci rogers com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:01:58 -0500
I know when we separated Concert from iMCI we where using the filters on them, and they IMO would have been a peer, but then again Concert sould have been a special case either way. -Jim -----Original Message----- From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny () tcb net] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:59 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Yes, at iMCI (we) had our own registry, MCI-RR, but we only used it (in addition to data from the other IRRs) to generate customer prefix filters, not peers. Cable & Wireless still uses the RR, now know as CW-RR. -danny
As I remember and I could be wrong, its been a few years now, when I
worked
for iMCI we did and we moved over to C&W we still did.
Current thread:
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all], (continued)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] David Barak (Mar 02)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] lhoward (Mar 03)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] David Barak (Mar 03)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Sean Donelan (Mar 03)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jared Mauch (Mar 01)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] leo vegoda (Mar 05)
- Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] bdragon (Mar 08)