nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 NAT
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:29:42 -0500 (EST)
I predict the next generation of VOIP to: a) run over encrypted tunnels. b) have a server based out of the US.. c) meet massive resistance from the EffBeeEye.. a) will change the issues being debated here. -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Paul Timmins (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 NAT Michel Py (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT David Lesher (Nov 01)
- RE: IPv6 NAT james (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Bill Owens (Nov 01)
- Wiltel Connectivity Issues Brian Boles (Nov 02)
- OT: RE: IPv6 NAT Paul Timmins (Nov 01)
- Re: OT: RE: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)