nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 NAT
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 15:15:18 -0500
james writes on 11/1/2003 2:30 PM:
The Sipphone has a "STUN" server function that makes doing SIP behind NAT/PAT workable. I am a little hazy on its function as I am testing and
perhaps short for secure tunnel - an ssl tunnel that takes your sip traffic through http or something, and proxying them through a remote server?
srs -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Paul Timmins (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 NAT Michel Py (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT David Lesher (Nov 01)
- RE: IPv6 NAT james (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Bill Owens (Nov 01)
- Wiltel Connectivity Issues Brian Boles (Nov 02)
- OT: RE: IPv6 NAT Paul Timmins (Nov 01)
- Re: OT: RE: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)