nanog mailing list archives
OT: RE: IPv6 NAT
From: Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 15:37:19 -0500
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 14:30, james wrote:
We use the Grandstream via sipphone.com for office to office calls. It is using the RTSP. Just doing some cheap testing before we integrate this into our Soft Switch, PBX and the PSTN. The Sipphone has a "STUN" server function that makes doing SIP behind NAT/PAT workable. I am a little hazy on its function as I am testing and wanted the phones on public IP's. Seems to keep the NAT/PAT translations constant by communicating with a remote server. Some users are doing SIP with this phone without problems behind NAT/PAT.
On mine I'm using for testing, if you turn NAT traversal on, and erase the contents of the STUN field (don't leave them at 0.0.0.0, it'll break), it does NAT traversal if the server supports it, without need for a STUN server, which I still can't find a copy of. Fortunately it's unnecessary. It works, as long as I don't try to contact another phone behind another NAT. -Paul -- Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 NAT, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Shawn Morris (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Paul Timmins (Nov 01)
- RE: IPv6 NAT Michel Py (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT David Lesher (Nov 01)
- RE: IPv6 NAT james (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 NAT Bill Owens (Nov 01)
- Wiltel Connectivity Issues Brian Boles (Nov 02)
- OT: RE: IPv6 NAT Paul Timmins (Nov 01)
- Re: OT: RE: IPv6 NAT Owen DeLong (Nov 01)