nanog mailing list archives
RE: Spam with no purpose?
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:45 -0800
Michel Py wrote: You can bet that it won't be long until we see such messages that not only use only dictionary words, but furthermore are constructed with a valid grammar (and still mean nothing).
William Leibzon wrote: I already saw it. Right now its just random phrases being put together and not yet entire text. And somewhere (actually several years ago), I've read of AI program capable of creating complete stories when its given some key phrases to start with, would not be surprised if same or similar algorithms began to be used.
Mind forwarding a few? I believe that these are early probes though; no reason to kill the "bunch of dictionary words" technique too early. Michel.
Current thread:
- Re: Mail with no purpose?, (continued)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric A. Hall (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Richard Cox (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Jonathan Nichols (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Gregory Hicks (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 02)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 04)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Chris Adams (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)