nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spam with no purpose?


From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:53:51 -0500


Once upon a time, Scott Call <scall () devolution com> said:
Kinda of makes you wonder if AP and the like could go after spammers
habeaus style on copyright infringement.  Since the spam is a source of
revenue, it could be construed as criminal copyright infringement as well
as civil....

Why bother with copyright sources; I don't expect I'm giving anyone any
ideas, but how much (grammatically correct) text is in Project
Gutenberg?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.


Current thread: