nanog mailing list archives
RE: Spam with no purpose?
From: Scott Call <scall () devolution com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Michel Py wrote:
Todd Vierling wrote: This has already happened; there is some well known spam that consists of HTML "content" or an image-based ad, with snippets of recent AP newswire stories in the plaintext body section.Indeed, and between AP newswire, good random generators and quotations borrowed from the zillion pages of text available on the web, it's going to take a really, really smart software to make the difference between spam and real email.
Kinda of makes you wonder if AP and the like could go after spammers habeaus style on copyright infringement. Since the spam is a source of revenue, it could be construed as criminal copyright infringement as well as civil.... -S -- Scott Call Router Geek, ATGi, home of $6.95 Prime Rib I make the world a better place, I boycott Wal-Mart VoIP incoming: +1 360-382-1814
Current thread:
- RE: Spam with no purpose?, (continued)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 02)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 04)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Chris Adams (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)