nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lazy network operators
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:58:59 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, daryl () introspect net wrote:
Not being happy with the ISP's smarthost is not justification to run your own; you should change ISPs.. assuming we implement this lockedThat's a super idea. Now explain how that works when you have access to only a single broadband provider. If you already thought of this scenario, you're seriously underestimating the number of people in this situation.
In my example I suggested that there would be tiers of service, for an extra fee they would give you a service where you could run your smarthost. As already mentioned there are other ways to send mail than port 25 which is an alternative to you. My original point still stands tho, if your SP isnt delivering complain, if they're unable to deliver email then you wont be the only one with problems. Steve
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Alex Bligh (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Maimon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Vivien M. (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Daniel Senie (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)