nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:31:02 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Joe Abley wrote: : > That was solved 6 years ago. You let them use port 587 instead of 25. : > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2476.html : Several graphical, consumer-grade mail clients let you select a port : for "outgoing mail (SMTP)" and also have a checkbox for "use a secure : connection (SSL)". : If (port != 25 && use_ssl) the client will assume an SSL-wrapped SMTP : server on the other end, and will not use STARTTLS. : I thought I'd mention it. You forgot to name the clients in question, since you're trying to help out helpdesks here. I'm sure several folks would like to know the real details. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com>
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Apr 20)
- RE: Lazy network operators Eric Krichbaum (Apr 13)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 13)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 13)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Miquel van Smoorenburg (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Alex Bligh (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Maimon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Vivien M. (Apr 14)