nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:14:26 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Petri Helenius wrote:
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:My original point still stands tho, if your SP isnt delivering complain, if they're unable to deliver email then you wont be the only one with problems.Changing providers when problems arise is a viable option when; - Available services are more uniform - Email addresses are generally portable - Switching your local access provider happens in less than a business day or two And as has been previously stated, most people donĀ“t have multiple options for local provider unless they want to dial up.
s/Email/Packets its the same, if its part of the service and its not working complain or switch Steve
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Maimon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Vivien M. (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Daniel Senie (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)