Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse

["Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon () cox net>]

Sean Donelan wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Scott Call wrote:
>
> > My point was that my $20 GE telephone cannot be made into a liability for
> > my telephone provider without my explicit participation, whereas a $20 a
> > month dialup (or $50 a month DSL, etc) customer can be a liability for me
> > just by being turned on.
>
> Although Bell Labs avoided publishing papers about weakness in the
> telephone system, it doesn't mean they don't exist.  The Communications
> Fraud Control Assocation has a decent publication on communications
> fraud.

Seems like John Draper had the corner on that market for a very long
time--1960's wasn't it when we had modify all the SF's?

--
Requiescas in pace o email