nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamcop
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 15:09:41 -0400
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote:
Just wondering why was my e-mail thread (Hierarchical Credit-based Queuing (HCQ): QoS) dated 5/9/2004 9:36 PM reported as a spam? Just trying to understand so that I don't repeat it. Below is a cut and paste of the reported incident.Vicky: I'm guessing here, but it was probably because the *.rr.com addresses originate a LOT of spam and someone has a procmail filter that automatically refers any mail from that domain to spamcop... Or it could be that someone didn't like what you wrote and reported it ...
I've found that a number of people that are spamcop subscribers report messages as spam that are not when they don't know how to get removed from lists. I find this annoying and always make a note in the spamcop ticket saying they're fools when this happens. I do wish that rr.com would get a different dns naming system set up (ala comcast, using client.comcast.net or similar subdomain that does not have MX records to help with the direct-to-server SMTP problem I have with rr.com with spam..) - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- Re: Spamcop, (continued)
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop chuck goolsbee (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop JC Dill (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)