nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamcop
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 15:31:32 -0500
JC Dill wrote:
It could also simply be a mistake. The inet-access list was once reported as a spam source by a happy subscriber who was busy reporting hundreds (or thousands?) of spams and clicked /included a list post by accident.--p.s. Please do not cc me on replies to the list. Please reply to the list only, or to me only (as you prefer) but not to both.
I'm going to join the guessing game and guess that some scoring system scored on uncommon words (hierarchical), trigger words (credit), and the number of Cc: entries (I did not count the ones in the original, the complaint had a bitch-list 4 or five long, some of the responses to it have 8 or 10 Cc:'s I think--I did not count them either), the origin (Road Runner) and so on and reached the conclusion of 'spam'. Welcome to the world where email has been taken away from us. -- Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/
Current thread:
- Re: Spamcop, (continued)
- Re: Spamcop Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop chuck goolsbee (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop JC Dill (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)