nanog mailing list archives
RE: RE: RE: NYSE
From: "Temkin, David" <temkin () sig com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:01:05 -0400
You are correct. The rings are geographically diverse and separated (ie, they have separate rings for each metro and then tie the rings together in multiple places). No idea about the right-of-ways, but my understanding is that it wasn't necessarily meant to be a be-all-end-all for those sorts of outages. You are correct, however, it is one of the most reliable infrastructures we connect to.
-----Original Message----- From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:rbk () midwestnsg com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:39 PM To: sgorman1 () gmu edu; 'Temkin, David' Cc: 'Alen Capalik'; 'Philip Lavine'; 'nanog' Subject: RE: RE: RE: NYSE My understanding is that the way the SFTI network is built the loss of an entire ring between Site A and Site B wouldn't cause an outage because Site B would also have a ring between it and Site C and Site A would be connected to Site n. I can't speak to how the fibers were procured and whether or not they're in their own rights-of-way (as another poster suggested; I'd guess that they're using previously dark fiber in existing bundles). Based-on the drawings I've seen (unfortunately, they don't appear to be on SFTI's web site so they must be considered proprietary) the multiple rings are separated in some places by several hundred miles to prevent the single back hoe incident. Aside from the $$ and the joy of dealing with SIAC (they tend to be a bit inflexible at times), the infrastructure has been quite stable in the 18 months that my client has been using it. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of sgorman1 () gmu edu Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:31 AM To: Temkin, David Cc: Alen Capalik; Philip Lavine; nanog Subject: Re: RE: RE: NYSE So, that would be a another conduit sitting in the same right of way, and this is supposed to make it "completely independent". Last time I checked a backhoe treated all conduits the same. Not trying to shoot the messanger jsut trying to make a point. Points of entry is different than the number of pipes. The biggest single problem in the security of these networks is physical diversity, at least in my biased point of view. There are six different sets of right of ways in Manhattan and forty something fiber providers, but no one seems to fess up when they are not offering redundancy but just another pipe in the same conduit. Do the math and you see the problem. It is not just a SFTI problem but a generic problem. Just worrisome that it appears that SFTI does not see it as a problem, or worse view at as a problem they have solved by laying new pipe in the same conduits. The problem rears it head in several examples where effeciency and cost savings trumps true diversity. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Temkin, David" <temkin () sig com> Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:11 am Subject: RE: RE: NYSEIt's my understanding that A) The providers of the actual ring did install "Separate"fiber forSFTI but I have no idea whether or not they're in newrights of way -I'm willing to bet not B) Reducing the points of entry into the ring reducescomplexity andmakes it much easier to recover the ring in the event of a disaster. Understanding that SIAC has thousands and thouands of customers connecting at the DS-3+ level to get data that's generated from one place means that you need to keep the distribution uniform. Basically,it boils down to them being able to say "Our ringis up, ifyour connectivity to our ring is down it's your problem" inorder tomaintainfairness between Trading firm A that has 10 peopleand Tradingfirm B that has 10,000 people. When they were maintaining separate interfaces for eachcustomer theycould potentially run into issues where they'd get certain larger firmsback able to trade sooner than smaller ones and thenyou createunfair market disadvantages.-----Original Message----- From: sgorman1 () gmu edu [mailto:sgorman1 () gmu edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:40 AM To: Temkin, David Cc: Alen Capalik; Philip Lavine; nanog Subject: Re: RE: NYSE There are a few things about the SFTI set up that are abit bafflingto me. From their website: SFTI carries IP traffic over a topology of redundant,self-healingfiber-optic rings, completely independent of all other telco circuits and conduits. SFTI's design is straightforward, consolidating traffic into fewer pipes, which minimizescomplexityand reduces the number of potential points of failure. What does "completely independent of all other telco circuits and conduits" mean? Did they get their very own "new" rightof ways dugout. A certain government report listed their physical fiber provider, and they certainly are not new right of ways. Further, I'm a bit baffled how reducing the number of pipes reduces the number of potential points of failure. Usually fewer pipes means less diversity. A ring is nice till someone hits it in two places. I also wonder how many of these rings are collapsed in a single conduit. I hope someoneover thereis asking tough questions and are following up on gettinga secondphysical fiber provider. I'd recommend not advertising who it this time either. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Temkin, David" <temkin () sig com> Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:45 am Subject: RE: NYSEYou can no longer order "direct" lines to SIAC unless you haveanextremely compelling reason. Nowadays you must order aline to "SFTI"which is their Disaster-Recovery-centric service. You arecorrectaboutthe connection method, but he will need to be specificandunderstandthat he wants to connect to SFTI and not just "SIAC" directly anymore. See: https://sfti.siac.com/sfti/index.jsp for more details.-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu[mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On BehalfOf Alen Capalik Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 10:20 PM To: Philip Lavine Cc: nanog Subject: Re: NYSE On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 10:36:16AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:If I where to connect to SIAC thru a SONNET ring who'swould it be? Isit private or public?They use any provider (Verizon, MCI, AT&T and ConEdComm.), howeverConED Comm. is their primary backbone provider. So,here's how yougo about it. You order a line (DS-1, DS-3, 100Mb/s, Gig,whatever)from any of the providers you use (if I were you I woulduse eitherVerizon or ConEd Comm, I can give you the number for ConEdComm.head sales person). You contact SIAC, and you start thepaperworkto get your network connected into their backbone SONET.Once youget permit numbers, you have the provider drop a lineinto one of 5data centers around NY area, and SIAC gives you a port onone oftheir Juniper Routers. They also give you a VLAN setuprequirementsso you can configure your border switch/router. The line is owned by you. SIAC only gives you a port ontheirrouters. NOTE: NEVER ORDER ONE LINE. ORDER TWO OR MORE LINES TO DIFFERENT SIAC DATA CENTERS. Thecostfor one port (one line) is as follows: MRC (Monthly Reaccuring Cost): $4,400.00 NRC (Non-Reaccuring Cost i.e. one time fee): $8,800 Any line you drop at SIAC will cost you that amount, andthat's ontop of the line costs from the provider. That's it. Hopethishelps. Like I said it's a very long and tedious processgetting theline up and running with SIAC. They are practically a government institution, and theydon't movetoo fast for anybody.--- "R. Benjamin Kessler" <rbk () midwestnsg com> wrote:I've setup a highly-redundant connection for one of myclients(equipment in two different access-centers in twodifferent cities).What are you looking to do? - Ben ~~~~~~~~~~ R. Benjamin Kessler Sr. Network Consultant CCIE #8762, CISSP, CCSE Midwest Network Services Group Email: rbk () midwestnsg com http://www.midwestnsg.com Phone: 260-625-3273 -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Philip Lavine Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 2:38 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: NYSE Does anyone have experience in setting up a directconnection withNYSE, specifically SIAC or SFTI? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail-- Alen Capalik CTO Wiretap Networks Inc. Tel: (310)497-3512 Email: alen () wiretapnetworks com Website: http://www.wiretapnetworks.com /* * Anything that is considered impossibility, * will in fact occur with absolute certainty. */IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intendedrecipient,please notify the sender immediately by reply andimmediately deletethis message and all its attachments. Any review, use,reproduction,disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachmentby anunintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither thismessage norany attachment is intended as or should be construed as anoffer,solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security orotherfinancial instrument. Neither the sender, his or heremployer nor anyof their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the informationcontained herein orthat this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply andimmediately deletethis message and all its attachments. Any review, use,reproduction,disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither thismessage norany attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or heremployer nor anyof their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the informationcontained herein orthat this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Current thread:
- NYSE Philip Lavine (Sep 17)