nanog mailing list archives
Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now
From: Pete Templin <petelists () templin org>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:13:27 -0600
Jeff Aitken wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:44:20PM -0600, Pete Templin wrote:I came up with a reasonably scalable solution using communities and route-map continue, but:For what value of "scalable"?
For me, plenty, but a four-POP single-state network usually has different constraints on "scalable". However, I'd categorize it as one community-list per MED tier (i.e. if you just want near/far, that's two tiers, etc.) and one community-list entry per POP (or group of POPs, if you have some grouping logic embedded in your internal communities).
pt
Current thread:
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now, (continued)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Curran (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now vijay gill (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jeff Aitken (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Deepak Jain (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jeff Aitken (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jon Lewis (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Payne (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Brandon Ross (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Brandon Ross (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Florian Weimer (Nov 01)