nanog mailing list archives
Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:20:39 -0500
For me, plenty, but a four-POP single-state network usually has different constraints on "scalable". However, I'd categorize it as one community-list per MED tier (i.e. if you just want near/far, that's two tiers, etc.) and one community-list entry per POP (or group of POPs, if you have some grouping logic embedded in your internal communities).
I think Pete is saying that as long as you aren't a control-nazi, its a good system. :)
Given that constraint, I wonder how of NANOG it applies to. ;) Deepak
Current thread:
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now, (continued)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Curran (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now vijay gill (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jeff Aitken (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Pete Templin (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Deepak Jain (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jeff Aitken (Nov 02)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Jon Lewis (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now John Payne (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Brandon Ross (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Brandon Ross (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Florian Weimer (Nov 01)
- Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now Deepak Jain (Nov 02)