nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks


From: Bora Akyol <bora.akyol () aprius com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:09:58 -0700


You can check freshness of a message by means of sequence numbers, no?

Bora



On 9/18/07 8:55 AM, "Xin Liu" <smilerliu () gmail com> wrote:

Ideally, yes, a protocol should not rely on clock synchronization at
all. However, to ensure freshness of messages, we don't have many
choices, and clock synchronization seems to be the least painful one.
So we asked about router clocks on the current Internet. If normally
router clocks are synchronized and we have a mechanism to detect and
fix out-of-sync clocks, is it reasonable to assume clock
synchronization in the rest of our design?

Best
Regards,

Xin Liu

On 9/17/07, Bora Akyol <bora.akyol () aprius com> wrote:
IMHO:

What ever solution you end up proposing should able to handle (3) and should
work with arbitrary boundaries for (1) & (2).

We don't want to add another failure mode to the network that depends on
time synchronization.

You don't want to shift the problem from BGP to NTP.

Regards

Bora


Current thread: