nanog mailing list archives

RE: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?


From: "Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia)" <kin-wei.lee () hp com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:57:49 +0000

Hi Charles/Skywing, is Verizon filter the unsolicated inbound traffic on the firewall or on the border router?

Regards,
Steven Lee 

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:charles () thewybles com] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 6:09 AM
To: Skywing
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?

Yep verizon does indeed filter all unsolicated inbound traffic to the 
EVDO network. It can be a blessing or a curse. :)

Skywing wrote:
Verizon filters unsolicited inbound traffic for their EVDO customers in my experience.

- S

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 09:32
To: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?


On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote:

Please share your thought and thanks in advance :)

No, IMHO.  Most broadband operators don't insert firewalls inline in
front of their subscribers, and wireless broadband is no different.

The infrastructure itself must be protected via iACLs, the various
vendor-specific control-plane protection mechanisms, and so forth, but
inserting additional state in the middle of everything doesn't buy
anything, and introduces additional constraints and concerns.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // +852.9133.2844 mobile

   Our dreams are still big; it's just the future that got small.

                   -- Jason Scott






Current thread: