nanog mailing list archives

RE: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?


From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:58:07 -0400

That's why you use Teredo - it defeats that sort of simple statefulness, and
works.
((SSH'ed from one laptop (WinXP, using MS's Teredo over double-NATed v4
connection) to another laptop (Ubuntu, EVDO, + Miredo) ... although it was
pretty slow, it fit my needs at the time.))

For a time, maybe still today?, 6to4 would work as well.  That is, the
carrier may have been filtering unsolicited TCP/UDP ... but not Protocol41.
(Off the top of my head, I forget which providers fell into which side of
the ItWorked | ItStillWorks camp)


/TJ


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:charles () thewybles com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 6:09 PM
To: Skywing
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?

Yep verizon does indeed filter all unsolicated inbound traffic to the EVDO
network. It can be a blessing or a curse. :)

Skywing wrote:
Verizon filters unsolicited inbound traffic for their EVDO customers in
my
experience.

- S

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 09:32
To: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?


On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote:

Please share your thought and thanks in advance :)

No, IMHO.  Most broadband operators don't insert firewalls inline in
front of their subscribers, and wireless broadband is no different.

The infrastructure itself must be protected via iACLs, the various
vendor-specific control-plane protection mechanisms, and so forth, but
inserting additional state in the middle of everything doesn't buy
anything, and introduces additional constraints and concerns.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // +852.9133.2844 mobile

   Our dreams are still big; it's just the future that got small.

                   -- Jason Scott






Current thread: