nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:24:35 +1100
In message <1255388942.12984.1.camel@acer-laptop>, Bret Clark writes:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 09:40 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:Verizon's policy has been related to me that they will not acceptorpropogate any IPv6 route advertisements with prefix lengths longerthan/32. Full stop. So that even includes those of us that have /48PIspace from ARIN that are direct customers of Verizon.Looks like Verizon doesn't want any IPv6 customers. If a company has idiotic policies like this vote with your wallet.Unfortunately, not everyone always has that choice.
If there isn't as choice then regulation is required. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering], (continued)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Phil Regnauld (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Dave Temkin (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Charles Wyble (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Jeff McAdams (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Bret Clark (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Seth Mattinen (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy David Conrad (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Owen DeLong (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy David Conrad (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Christopher Morrow (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Adrian Chadd (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Kevin Loch (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Seth Mattinen (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)