nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:43:31 -0700
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Yes. We should all jump up and down and complain about the early adopters who were present at the time and helped develop (and fund the development of) the Internet into something that pays most of our paychecks today.Cutler James R wrote:I also just got a fresh box of popcorn. I will sit by and waitI honestly am not trying to be a troll. It's just everytime I glance over the IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry I feel rather annoyed about all those /8s that were assigned back in the day without apparently realising we might run out.
Or not.And of course some of the folks who got /8s early on have turned them back. Others have merged into entities who use a whole lot of the space.
Matthew Kaufman
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Roland Perry (Apr 04)
- Commodore PET, was: Re: legacy /8 Jeroen van Aart (Apr 11)
- Re: Commodore PET, was: Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- alt.folklore.nanog (was:Re: Commodore PET, was: Re: legacy /8) Lamar Owen (Apr 14)
- Re: alt.folklore.nanog Jeroen van Aart (Apr 14)
- Re: legacy /8 Steven Bellovin (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Jeffrey I. Schiller (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Matthew Kaufman (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Barry Shein (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Robert Brockway (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Thomas (Apr 02)