nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:17:07 +0900
IMHO it is a gambit to ask for money.
and this is based on what facts? when this kind of stuff goes down, we need to pay a bit of attention to actual authenticable fact and not indulge in too much conjecturbation. randy
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mike (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Craig Labovitz (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mikhail Strizhov (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Paul Ferguson (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Craig Labovitz (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mike (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable // ravi (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Zaid Ali (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)