nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:36:58 -0600
But Jorge has a point. If they wanted to help users get past their DNS problems, they could tweet for assistance, tweet their IP addy and ask to be re-tweeted, ask owners of authorities to set up wikileaks.$FOO.com to 'crowd source' their name, etc.
I'll just point to an article I found very interesting about this matter: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101202/02243512089/how-response-to-wikileaks-is-exactly-what-assange-wants.shtml Aren't we being part of some kind of action-reaction game to produce systematic changes as side effects ? -J
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mike (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Craig Labovitz (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mikhail Strizhov (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Paul Ferguson (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Craig Labovitz (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mike (Dec 01)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable // ravi (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Zaid Ali (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 03)
- Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Peter Dambier (Dec 06)