nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS on autopilot?
From: William Hamilton <bill () edisys co uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:26:54 +0000
On 15/01/2010 16:14, William Herrin wrote:
Is it bad English? Is it not clear?No, it is not clear.
It's perfectly clear.
Can anyone else give better wording that might result in less of an issue?"Please reply to this message to reopen your ticket and escalate your case to a live human being."
You:"Please reply to this message to reopen your ticket and escalate your case to a live human being."
And now SORBS: "If you feel otherwise, please reply to this message to re-open your ticket." Try as I might I really can't see what is not clear here... B
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS on autopilot?, (continued)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? telmnstr (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Steve Ryan (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michelle Sullivan (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Ronald Cotoni (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michelle Sullivan (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Brian Keefer (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Hamilton (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Larry Sheldon (Jan 15)
- Bad Support Bots (was: SORBS on autopilot?) Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: Bad Support Bots William Hamilton (Jan 15)
- Re: Bad Support Bots Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: excessive automation bmanning (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? paul (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michelle Sullivan (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? paul (Jan 15)