Re: NSP-SEC

[William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>]

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:52 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?
>
> I might argue the "few" comment, but I think it's better not to reply to Guillaume so people who are smart enough to 
> not see his posts (which would be quite a bit more than a "few") will not be force to see them.

I would say that, in general, more people care about NANOG than
nsp-security, although nsp-security is a worthwhile resource for those
who are dealing with backbone-level problems (which is a minority of the
people on NANOG, who generally are managing single
typically-not-multihomed sites for the most part).

> Although I have to admit I am impressed at how quickly he has managed to piss off, alienate, and pretty much 
> guarantee lasting animosity from, well, pretty much every significant person on the 'Net.  Perhaps we should lump 
> Guillaume in with $HE_WHO_MUST_NOT_BE_NAMED[*]?

Ugh, that IADL guy.  I blackholed his entire IP block at edge because I
got tired of receiving his crap.  :D

And yeah, I'm surprised Guillaume can actually post here still.

William