nanog mailing list archives

Re: NSP-SEC

From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:44:29 -0500

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:

An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.


Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing?  This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total
bullshit.

Just saying.

William

Current thread:

Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- - Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 18)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 18)
    - Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Paul WALL (Mar 19)
  - Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Brielle Bruns (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Jorge Amodio (Mar 19)
  - Re: NSP-SEC Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC John Kristoff (Mar 19)
  - Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity bmanning (Mar 19)
    - RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Green, Tim R (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 19)
    - Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here]) Larry Sheldon (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
    - Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 20)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)

(Thread continues...)