nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity
From: Guillaume FORTAINE <gfortaine () live com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:18:56 +0100
If we had that, no secrecy would be needed. But anyone who thinks publishing everything we learn about the miscreants is a Good Idea, has never tried to take out a botnet or snow-shoe spammer or ...
Me, an evolvable malware : http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.genetic-programming.org/hc2009/3-Noreen/Noreen-Presentation.ppt Best Regards, Guillaume FORTAINE
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Brielle Bruns (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Jorge Amodio (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC John Kristoff (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity bmanning (Mar 19)
- RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Green, Tim R (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here]) Larry Sheldon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 22)