nanog mailing list archives
RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity
From: "Green, Tim R" <Tim.Green2 () mms gov>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:03:00 -0400
There are some out there......Infragard?....(shrugs shoulders)...... -----Original Message----- From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com [mailto:bmanning () vacation karoshi com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:57 AM To: William Pitcock Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:44:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:An ongoing area of work is to build better closed, trusted communities without leaks.Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total bullshit.
I thnk I'd settle for operators with Integrity. those who do what they say. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Paul WALL (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Brielle Bruns (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Jorge Amodio (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC John Kristoff (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity bmanning (Mar 19)
- RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Green, Tim R (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here]) Larry Sheldon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)