nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:34:34 -0800
On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:08 PM, david raistrick wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:What's the point of switching to IPv6 if it repeats all the IPv4 mistakes only with bigger addresses? If you like NAT IPv4 is the place to be, it'll only get more and more.It's argument like this that has lead to this moment. Instead of discussing "how can the next generation addressing scheme support the needs of Internet consumers today and tomorrow" we tell people "if you don't like it, use v4" Guess what? We're still using v4. ..david
Enjoy that. Let's see how that goes in 5-7 years. If you're determined to destroy IPv6 by bringing the problems of NAT forward with you, then, I'm fine with you remaining in your IPv4 island. I'm willing to bet that most organizations will embrace an internet unencumbered by the brokenness that is NAT and move forward. I do not think that lack of NAT has been a significant barrier to IPv6 adoption, nor do I think it will be. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Skeeve Stevens (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Christopher Morrow (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Geoff Huston (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Petach (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Rene Wilhelm (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Geoff Huston (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... David Barak (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Blake Dunlap (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 02)