nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & HE
From: Ken Chase <ken () sizone org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:10:27 -0400
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:05:05PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen said: >global reachability, in the hopes that it will strengthen their >strategic position for peering in the long term (i.e. they both want to >be an "IPv6 Tier 1"). > >I'm not making a judgement call about the rightness or wrongness of the >strategy (and after all, it clearly hasn't been THAT big of an issue >considering that it has been this way for MANY months), but to attempt >to "blame" one party for this issue is the height of absurdity. PR >stunts and cake baking not withstanding, they're both equally complicit. So we have to buy from BOTH HE and Cogent?! Sounds like market fixing to me! :/ Guess if we do we can advertise that on our webpage... "now with BOTH halves of the ipv6 internets!" /kc -- Ken Chase - ken () heavycomputing ca skype:kenchase23 +1 416 897 6284 Toronto Canada Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
Current thread:
- Cogent & HE Dennis Burgess (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Seth Mattinen (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cogent & HE Brielle Bruns (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE manny (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Nathan Eisenberg (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jared Mauch (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jay Hanke (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Martin Millnert (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)