nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & HE
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:11:14 -0500
On 6/8/2011 3:05 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I'm not making a judgement call about the rightness or wrongness of the strategy (and after all, it clearly hasn't been THAT big of an issue considering that it has been this way for MANY months), but to attempt to "blame" one party for this issue is the height of absurdity. PR stunts and cake baking not withstanding, they're both equally complicit.
+1Also looks like Level3 still hasn't peered with HE, though they have fixed their peering to google at least.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent & HE, (continued)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jared Mauch (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jay Hanke (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Martin Millnert (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Kevin Loch (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Saku Ytti (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Saku Ytti (Jun 09)