nanog mailing list archives
Re: trouble with .gov dns?
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 19:13:11 +0200
* William Herrin:
Anyone else having trouble with .gov DNS failing with edns-udp-size set to 512?
You need an UDP size of at least 1220 for DNSSEC, see RFC 3226, section 3. A query that advertises a smaller buffer size is non-compliant. BIND will send such queries, but this is a controversial feature. This has been noted before, for example: From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> Subject: [dnsext] Failure to add glue MUST cause TC to be set. To: dnsext () ietf org Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 08:07:15 +1100 Message-Id: <20110219210716.72943A5602B () drugs dv isc org>
Current thread:
- trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Tony Finch (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? David Conrad (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Edward Lewis (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)