nanog mailing list archives
Re: trouble with .gov dns?
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 00:47:15 +0100
Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:
I have "dnssec-enable no;" in my bind config.It does not seem to have the intended effect.
BIND's interpretation of the DO bit is "I understand DNSSEC RRs so it is OK to send them" not "I would like you to send DNSSEC RRs". This is why it always sets the DO bit when it can, i.e. when the request contains an EDNS OPT pseudo-RR. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ Rockall, Malin, Hebrides: South 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 at first in Rockall and Malin, veering west or northwest 4 or 5, then backing southwest 5 or 6 later. Rough or very rough. Occasional rain. Moderate or good, occasionally poor.
Current thread:
- trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Tony Finch (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? David Conrad (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Edward Lewis (May 03)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? William Herrin (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)
- Re: trouble with .gov dns? Florian Weimer (May 02)