Re: trouble with .gov dns?

[Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>]

* Tony Finch:

> Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:
> > > I have "dnssec-enable no;" in my bind config.
> >
> > It does not seem to have the intended effect.
>
> BIND's interpretation of the DO bit is "I understand DNSSEC RRs so
> it is OK to send them" not "I would like you to send DNSSEC
> RRs". This is why it always sets the DO bit when it can, i.e. when
> the request contains an EDNS OPT pseudo-RR.

I would go even further---the DO bit is not about DNSSEC at all.  The
resolver just promises to ignore any ancillary record sets it does not
understand.  If DO were about DNSSEC, a new flag would have been
introduced along with DNSSECbis, where the record types changed so
that for resolvers implementing the older protocol, the DNSSECbis
records just looked like garbage.