nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:15:43 -0400
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:42, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com> wrote:
So are they basing this on you downloading it or on making it available for others?
Without knowing the details, I wouldn't assume any such level of competence or integrity. It could just be a broad witch hunt.
Apologies for the top post...
Never apologize for top posting, it just starts the flame war all over again.
Current thread:
- 23,000 IP addresses Marshall Eubanks (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses chip (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Marshall Eubanks (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jon Lewis (May 10)
- RE: 23,000 IP addresses Baklarz, Ron (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Leigh Porter (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Scott Brim (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Pitcock (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses chip (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Robert Bonomi (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses David Conrad (May 12)