nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:48:26 -0400
I wonder how things go if you challenge them in court. This is surely a topic for another list, but it seems to me it'd be fairly difficult to prove unless they downloaded part of the movie from your IP and verified that what they got really was a part of the movie.
I have the netflow records to prove this is NOT the case. All MediaSentry (et.al.) do is scrape the tracker. We have also received a number of takedown notices that have numbers transposed, involve parts of our netblock that were not in use at the time in question, etc. I would think that whole "penalty of perjury" thing would have some weight behind it. Stanford (in)famously managed to get DMCA notices for all the printers on campus, just by faking a client into putting the printer's IP into the tracker as a seed. Cheers, Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Current thread:
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Marshall Eubanks (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jon Lewis (May 10)
- RE: 23,000 IP addresses Baklarz, Ron (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Leigh Porter (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Scott Brim (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Pitcock (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Robert Bonomi (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses David Conrad (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Mark Radabaugh (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Allen Simpson (May 11)