nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Mark Radabaugh <mark () amplex net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:54:44 -0400
On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena compliance fee.A Federal Judge has decided to let the "U.S. Copyright Group" subpoena ISPs over 23,000 alleged downloads of some Sylvester Stallone movie I have never heard of; subpoenas are expected to go out this week. I thought that there might be some interest in the list of these addresses : http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/05/expendibleipaddresses.pdf If you have IP addresses on this list, expect to receive papers shortly. Here is more of the backstory : http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/05/biggest-bittorrent-case/ This is turning into quite a legal racket (get order $ 3000 for sending a threatening letter); I expect to see a lot more of this until some sense returns to the legal system. Regards Marshall
23,000 * $150 each should only cost them $3.45M to get the information. Seems like that would take the profit out pretty quickly. -- Mark Radabaugh Amplex mark () amplex net 419.837.5015
Current thread:
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Pitcock (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Daniel Staal (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Robert Bonomi (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses David Conrad (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Mark Radabaugh (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Allen Simpson (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Joel Jaeggli (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Message not available
- Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Luis Marta (May 10)